Claude by Anthropic processes prompts differently than other models. Understanding its unique strengths lets you unlock capabilities most users miss.
Claude's Unique Strengths
- 200K token context - Paste entire codebases, books, or document collections
- Structured thinking - Excels at systematic analysis and reasoning
- XML tag support - Use tags to clearly separate prompt sections
- Honest uncertainty - Claude will tell you when it's not sure
- Artifacts - Creates standalone documents, code, and visualizations
The XML Prompting Pattern
Claude responds exceptionally well to XML-structured prompts:
<context>
You are reviewing a quarterly sales report for a B2B SaaS company. Revenue is $2.4M, up 18% QoQ. Churn increased from 3.2% to 4.1%.
</context>
<instructions>
Analyze this data and provide:
1. Key insights (3-5 bullet points)
2. Concerns and risks
3. Recommended actions for next quarter
</instructions>
<formatting>
Use markdown headers. Be direct and specific with numbers.
</formatting>Long-Context Strategies
Document Analysis
I'm providing a 50-page contract below. Please:
1. Summarize the key terms in plain language
2. Identify any unusual or potentially problematic clauses
3. List all obligations for Party A with deadlines
4. Flag any ambiguous language that could cause disputes
<document>
[PASTE FULL CONTRACT]
</document>Codebase Review
Here is the complete source code for my Node.js API.
<codebase>
[PASTE ALL FILES]
</codebase>
<task>
1. Identify security vulnerabilities
2. Find performance bottlenecks
3. Suggest architectural improvements
4. Check for inconsistent error handling
Prioritize by severity: Critical → High → Medium → Low
</task>Multi-Document Synthesis
I'm providing three research papers on [TOPIC].
<paper1>[...]</paper1>
<paper2>[...]</paper2>
<paper3>[...]</paper3>
Synthesize these papers:
- Where do they agree and disagree?
- What methodology does each use?
- What are the combined implications?
- What gaps remain unexplored?Analysis & Reasoning Prompts
Decision Framework
I need to choose between AWS, GCP, and Azure for hosting our startup's infrastructure.
<requirements>
- Budget: $3,000/month initially, scaling to $15,000
- Stack: Next.js, PostgreSQL, Redis, S3-compatible storage
- Team size: 3 developers
- Priority: Developer experience > Cost > Feature breadth
</requirements>
Create a weighted decision matrix. Score each option 1-10 on: cost, DX, scaling, managed services, community support. Show your reasoning for each score.Systematic Debugging
I have a bug I can't figure out. Walk me through diagnosing it systematically.
<symptoms>
[Describe what's happening]
</symptoms>
<expected>
[What should happen]
</expected>
<code>
[Relevant code]
</code>
<tried>
[What you've already attempted]
</tried>
Don't jump to a solution. First, list hypotheses ranked by likelihood, then suggest diagnostic steps for the top 3.Creative & Writing Prompts
Structured Content Creation
<role>Tech journalist writing for a developer audience</role>
<task>Write an article about the rise of AI coding assistants</task>
<requirements>
- 1,200 words
- Include real tool names and specific features
- Balance optimism with honest limitations
- Include quotes from hypothetical developer interviews
- Conclude with actionable recommendations
</requirements>
<style>
Informative but conversational. Use analogies. Avoid buzzwords.
</style>Artifacts: Claude's Secret Weapon
Ask Claude to create artifacts for standalone outputs:
- "Create an artifact with a React component that..."
- "Build an interactive SVG diagram showing..."
- "Write a complete markdown document for..."
Artifacts are rendered separately and can be copied, iterated, and shared.
Pro Tips
- Front-load context - Put the most important information at the beginning and end (not buried in the middle)
- Be explicit about length - Claude can be verbose; specify "be concise" or give word limits
- Ask for confidence levels - "How confident are you? What could be wrong with this analysis?"
- Use thinking tags - "Before answering, think through your reasoning in <thinking> tags"
- Iterate with precision - Instead of "make it better," say exactly what to change and why